im very, very upset about this and i want someone from wizards to answer some questions re: 4th, specifically will the 4e online tools still be up, will it be supported in the mags or on the website at all after 5th comes out
i hope you guys dont forget some of us love 4e and are not fired up for a new edition. it has only been 4 years. i play retro games already and a rules-lite dnd is not something i need another copy of.
i am a big fan of your writing but would like more info on what is to come of 4th in all this
I’m looking forward to the new edition and hoping that some of the 3-4e changes are backed out. Sure, I’m an old school retro guy, but I didn’t need complete balance among the classes. I like that the wizard is frail in the beginning and becomes powerful later. A fighter IS one dimensional. MEDIC!! Those are classic roles that helped build party interdependence, not the jack-of-all-trades-let’s-give-everyone-a-chance-to-pick-that-lock style. A return to classical fantasy. (We also need more adventure modules)
Hah! This post made me laugh.
Good luck to those of you working on the new edition. I enjoy 4e but am interested in what changes are in store for the future.
ROFLMAO.
im very, very upset about this and i want someone from wizards to answer some questions re: 4th, specifically will the 4e online tools still be up, will it be supported in the mags or on the website at all after 5th comes out
i hope you guys dont forget some of us love 4e and are not fired up for a new edition. it has only been 4 years. i play retro games already and a rules-lite dnd is not something i need another copy of.
i am a big fan of your writing but would like more info on what is to come of 4th in all this
forth: Schwalb is a freelance, not an actual WotC employee, so he’s not likely to able to answer your questions.
Anyway, as I’ve soured somewhat on 4E, this is exciting news to me.
I’m looking forward to the new edition and hoping that some of the 3-4e changes are backed out. Sure, I’m an old school retro guy, but I didn’t need complete balance among the classes. I like that the wizard is frail in the beginning and becomes powerful later. A fighter IS one dimensional. MEDIC!! Those are classic roles that helped build party interdependence, not the jack-of-all-trades-let’s-give-everyone-a-chance-to-pick-that-lock style. A return to classical fantasy. (We also need more adventure modules)